|
View Poll Results: Real or Fake Christmas Tree - which do you prefer?
|
|
Real Tree
|
  
|
4 |
44.44% |
|
Fake Tree
|
  
|
5 |
55.56% |
 |

25-11-2011, 07:44 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 16,732
|
|
Christmas Trees - Real vs Fake
This week many of us will be setting up our Christmas trees in our homes. And we have to ask ourselves the old age question - a real or fake Christmas tree?
Here is an article going through the pros and cons of each.
With images of spray-on snow and tacky plastic needles dancing in their heads — especially after the craze for renditions in red — many holiday purists dismiss fake Christmas trees.
Pragmatists tally the time and energy spent growing and buying a real tree and tending it indoors and see advantages in the artificial, however — like not having to clean up needles and sap or even string lights in some cases.
While environmental concerns weigh in favor of real trees and artificial trees cost less over time, it may be most helpful to think of your tree choice as a question of style.
Do you cherish braving the chill winter air — perhaps the whole family heading all the way to the tree farm — to choose a tree to bring home and decorate? Or is the natural aroma of pine, spruce or fir outweighed by the predictability of a perfectly triangular tree that's always the right height for your living room?
Here are some ways to compare.
Pricing the tree
A real tree can cost less than $10 but typically runs closer to $100 or more, depending on size and species. Artificial trees generally sell for $25 to about $400 but can hit $2,000, depending on size and features like lighting and stands and extras like storage bags. So a fake tree is likely to be cheaper once you spread the cost over the typical five- to 10-year lifespan.
The hassle factor
Real trees can bring some real headaches. Even with proper watering, a pine purchased at Thanksgiving may be crispy by Christmas, and the dropped needles can keep surfacing for months afterward. In contrast, an artificial tree — with no upkeep — will be just as pretty on Twelfth Night as it was the day you put it up.
Still, fake trees must be assembled before use and then dismantled and stored in the off season. The 17-cubic-foot storage bag for a six- to nine-foot-tall tree can pose a significant challenge to an apartment dweller.
The environmental argument
If you see the tragedy of unrealized potential in the brevity of a Christmas tree's moment in the spotlight, take heart. Most real Christmas trees are reused; close to 5,000 private and muni****l programs across the country grind holiday trees into mulch or landscaping chips, according to Rick Dungey of the National Christmas Tree Association.
Most of the land used for tree farming is ill-suited to other crops, while farmed trees grow in roughly the same density as natural trees so they absorb similar amounts of carbon dioxide while they're growing. The NCTA says worries about chemicals that growers spray on trees is misplaced because the use of chemicals is regulated — and limited.
As for fake trees, those still in good condition can be donated or resold with minimal additional costs. A crafter may also try her hand at breaking down a fake tree with bolt cutters to make wreaths or garlands. But once a fake tree starts disintegrating, it's no longer safe or pleasing to use in any form. Few, if any, recycling programs accept them so they often end up in landfills.
And, despite the promise of recycled plastic, many fake trees sold in the U.S. are made abroad with no recycled content; others are made from recycled packaging material.
The stand, the skirt and lights
Here's where artificial trees come out way ahead. They require much less additional spending because they include a stand, often need no skirt and can be purchased with lights already attached.
Real trees, on the other hand, are used to having roots so require a stand ($15 to $90) to remain upright. Then you'll want a skirt to hide the stand (another $10 to $50). A real tree also requires three or four (or more) strings of lights at $2 to $20 each for incandescents, depending on color, shape and volume. LED — or light-emitting diode — lights cost more but can last five times longer.
So which do you prefer? Cast your vote in our poll.
__________________
Julie-Ann
Designs by Julie-Ann
www.decoratingforum.com.au
|

26-11-2011, 01:42 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Traralgon, Vic
Posts: 1,107
|
|
I prefer real but DHs allergies won't tolerate them.
__________________
www.mealsandmore.com.au
|

26-11-2011, 06:59 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 848
|
|
I've voted and prefer real but alas we have a fake.
My concern with real trees is the sap that sometimes drops and then you don't find it until after you've pulled the Christmas tree down and it's marked/ruined the carpet.
Anyway ... I've been saying for years to DH that nowadays with the brilliant real-looking fake trees that someone (like Ambi-Pur) needs to come up with a fragrance of Christmas trees .... you could then enjoy the best of both worlds!
__________________
Jess (formerly known as 4sterftg)
|

26-11-2011, 09:38 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 16,732
|
|
I voted for the fake trees. We normally always have a cat and they love to pee in the pot the tree is in  . So definitely fake trees. DH would like to go one step further and have a fake tree with Led lights. We searched everywhere last year for them but he didn't like any. So we bought a lovely bushy fake tree from Myers.
__________________
Julie-Ann
Designs by Julie-Ann
www.decoratingforum.com.au
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Site Navigation |
|
|
» Advertisements |
|
|
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:49 AM.